OEMs are well-positioned to enter the car subscription market by capitalizing on their established manufacturing capabilities, infrastructure, and dealership networks. It would serve as a logical extension of their current business models, with a strong incentive to attract a new customer base. This customer group is difficult for OEMs to reach through existing offers, as it includes customers who are not necessarily looking to buy or lease a car but prefer flexible access without long-term commitment.
For OEMs, the car subscription model presents an additional revenue stream that aligns with the growing Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) trend. In a market where flexibility and convenience are central criteria for consumers, OEMs that align their offerings with customer demand are likely to emerge as industry leaders. These benefits will allow OEMs to enhance their visibility and differentiate themselves from OEMs that do not provide subscription options. In addition, the subscription model has allowed many OEMs to establish a closer relationship with the customer by bypassing the wholesalers/dealers. This has enabled direct communication with customers, a valuable collection of customer insights, and increased customer lifetime value. Ultimately, car subscription is a strategy for OEMs to form connections with new customer segments, speed up their transition to become a direct-to-consumer player, broaden their business model, and reduce their dependency on traditional car sales.
However, OEMs are facing significant challenges with the car subscription model, primarily in terms of financial viability. Achieving profitability within this business model is inherently difficult due to several factors. First, OEMs generally lack the capabilities required to manage large fleets of subscription vehicles and therefore must invest in developing this competence and capacity. Second, the holding costs of cars have risen in recent years, driven by higher interest rates. Third, the uncertain residual values of EVs make it harder to predict resale values that can offset depreciation.
When a relatively new car is returned after a subscription cancellation, it often carries high holding costs, a lower-than-expected residual value, and limited revenue from the subscription itself, creating a formula that undermines profitability. This equation becomes even less favorable when considering the additional costs of logistics, service and maintenance, insurance, and other operational expenses.
Another key challenge is the balancing act of priority between the traditional car sales model and the subscription model. Given that OEMs have historically directed most attention and investment to vehicle sales, generating immediate revenue, shifting to subscription-based approach requires substantial adjustments to operational frameworks and long-term commitment and investments. A commitment that OEMs may lack based on Fortos research, which could add to the struggle of scaling the subscription model. This raises the question, whether the OEMs are in it for the long run, even when the profitability isn’t there in the short- to mid-term?